Is the President Right that Our Security Depends on Winning the War in Iraq?                                                                                                                               

Questions and Answers are cited below as "Q" and "A"

1. Q: Do more important facts reveal that the President is burdening the U.S. with an absurdly narrow focus on the facts of its position?

A: Yes.

2. Q: What does a broader vision reveal?

A: Start with the overlooked fact that passage of at least another generation of Chinese growth must lapse before China can make up for its generation of limitation of reproductive laws to one chid only.

Note that there is inherent weakness in China's position revealed by the notorious facts of its having to hound, persecute, jail and otherwise ruin the chances of good feeling and good productive results, from its sources of productivity.

3. Q: What is going on beyond the straits of Taiwan?

A: Sources reveal that a democratic China can exist without the excesses of mainland China.

Moreover, that Taiwan picture shows where highly productive Chinese deliberately separate themselves to remain productive and reveals that the future lies with a peaceful and productive relationship of China with the United States and UK.

4. Q: Do the facts reveal an additional source for U.S. security lying in development of space and interplanetary resources?

A: Yes.

5. Q: What are they?

A: Interplanetary travel is already in progress with prices showing that there is potential economic benefit and security to the United States in the mastership of space.

Moreover, there is solid scientific predictability that there will be travel to an interchanging economic between this planet and others in the far space.

6. Q: Is there an overall additional source for U.S. security?

A: Yes.

7. Q: What is it?

A: Overall, the President's effort to convince his public that they have no choice but security by winning in Iraq, is a far unlikely overview of what our better future contains.

8. Q: Is there a pithy summation to all of this?

A: Yes. See New York Times International, Friday, September 1, 2006: "Where's Mao? Chinese Revise History Books."

"Dynasties, revolutions and class struggle yield to stability, trade and technology."

9. Q: Is there more?

A: From the same NY Times article:

"The new history is less ideological and that suits the political goals of the day."

* * *

cc: George W. Bush, President
George H.W. Bush, Former President
Richard Cheney, Vice President John Kerry, Senator
Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State
Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense
Colonel Oliver North
Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security
Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney General
Tony Blair, Prime Minister of Great Britain
Jack Straw, British Foreign Secretary
Newt Gingrich, Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives
Ehud Olmert, Prime Minister of Israel
His Excellency Daniel Ayalon Ambassador of Israel
Benjamin Netanyahu, Economy Minister for the Israeli Government
Israel's "Women In Green"
National Unity Coalition for Israel
Arianna Huffington, Syndicated Columnist
Yohanan Ramati, Chairman, Jerusalem Institute for Western Defense
Gerardo Joffe, FLAME (Facts & Logic About the Middle East)
Mortimer Zuckerman, Editor in Chief - US News and World Report
Time Magazine
Washington Post - Attn: Bob Woodward
International Jerusalem Post
The Weekly Standard ñ Bill Kristol, Editor
The Wall Street Journal - Editorial and Op-Ed Department
The New York Times, Op-Ed Department
Los Angeles Times, Op-Ed Department
Dr. and Mrs. Jordan Phillips, Medical Books for China International
MoveOn PAC/www.MoveonPac.Org